Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on August 26, 2002.
As of Wednesday, January 15th, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

ModelsModification
2000-2002 Toyota Tundra 2001-2002 Toyota Sequoia 1998-2002 Toyota Land Cruiser 1998-2002 Lexus LX470The Supercharger Kit includes the following main components: Eaton supercharger with integrated intake manifold and ninth injector, 160 degree thermostat to replace the 180 degree original thermostat, and a supercharger ECU. The stock air filter housing and intake air tubing is retained; however, the Land Cruiser and LX470 intake air tubing is cut in the middle and shortened by 10 mm, all other emission related components including the throttle-body are transferred to the new intake manifold in a stock functional location. Maximum boost is 7.5 psi. Supercharger pulley dia. is 2.2" and crankshaft pulley dia. is 5.51"

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-425-10
  • Executive Order 425-10 / D425-10
  • ARB # D-425-10
  • Executive Order No: D-425-10
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-425-10
  • Resolution D-425-10
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-425-10 PDF

D-425-10 Document:


CARB_D-425-10

                                     State of California
                                 AIR RESOURCES BOARD

                               EXECUTIVE ORDER D—425—10

                        Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156
                                     of the Vehicle Code

                                 Toyota Racing Development
                                    Supercharger System

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the
Vehicle Code; and

Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Section 39515 and Section 39516 of
the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—02—003;

IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the installation of the Supercharger System,
manufactured and marketed by the Toyota Racing Development, 1382 Valencia Avenue,
Tustin, California 92780 has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the applicable
vehicle pollution control system and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section
27156 of the Vehicle Code for the vehicle applications listed:

                                      Pulley Dia.
Model—Year       Disp. Max. Boost Supercharger/Crank               Application
2000—2002        4.7L     7.5 psi.    2.2"/5.51"                   Toyota Tundra
2001—2002        4.7L     7.5 psi.    2.2"/5.51"  _                Toyota Sequoia
1998—2002        4.7L     7.5 psi.    2.2"/5.51"                   Toyota Land Cruiser
1998—2002        4.7L     7.5 psi.    2.2"/5.51"                   Lexus LX470

The Supercharger Kit includes the following main components: Eaton supercharger with
integrated intake manifold and ninth injector, 160 degree thermostat to replace the 180 degree
original thermostat, and a supercharger ECU. The stock air filter housing and intake air tubing
is retained; however, the Land Cruiser and LX470 intake air tubing is cut in the middle and
shortened by 10 mm, all other emission related components including the throttle—body are
transferred to the new intake manifold in a stock functional location. Maximum boost is 7.5 psi.

This Executive Order is valid provided that the installation instructions for the supercharger will
not recommend tuning the vehicle to specifications different from those submitted by the
device manufacturer.

Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the Supercharger System, as exempt
by the Air Resources Board, which adversely affect the performance of the vehicle‘s pollution
control system shall invalidate this Executive Order.

This Executive Order shall not apply to any Supercharger System advertised, offered for sale,
sold with, or installed on a new motor vehicle prior to or concurrent with transfer to an ultimate
purchaser.


                                               2.


Marketing of the supercharger using any identification other than that shown in this Executive
Order or marketing of the supercharger for an application other than those listed in this
Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources
Board. Exemption of the supercharger shall not be construed as exemption to sell, offer for
sale, or advertise any component of the kit as an individual device.

This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect the use of the
supercharger may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle
manufacturer.

This Executive Order is granted based on emissions test data generated on a 2002 Toyota
Sequoia certified to the Ultra Low—Emission Vehicle (ULEV) emission standards. Emission
levels of the modified vehicle met the applicable emission standards over the Cold—Start
CVS—75 Federal Test Procedure (FTP). Results are in grams per mile with deterioration
factors added to the results:

                  NMOG CO         NOx    HCHO
Standards         0.117 5.0       0.6    0.011
Device            0.100 2.0       0.2    0.001

This Executive Order is also based on an On—Board Diagnostic II (OBD I1) test conducted on
the same test vehicle. Test data showed that the supercharger when installed on the vehicle
did not affect the vehicle‘s ability to perform its OBD II monitoring.

This Executive Order is granted based on submitted emissions test data which showed that
the Toyota Racing Development‘s Supercharger System did not adversely affect tailpipe
emissions during the Cold Start CVS—75 Federal Test Procedure. However, the ARB finds
that reasonable grounds exist to believe that use of the Toyota Racing Development‘s
Supercharger System may adversely affect emissions of motor vehicles when operating under
conditions outside the parameters of the previously prescribed test procedures. Accordingly,
the ARB reserves the right to conduct additional emission tests, in the future, as such tests
are developed, that will more adequately measure emissions from all cycle phases. If such
test results demonstrate that the supercharger adversely affects emissions during off—cycle
conditions (defined as those conditions which are beyond the parameters of the Cold—Start
CVS—75 Federal Test Procedure), this Executive Order shall be effectively rescinded as of the
date the test results are validated. Further, if such test results or other evidence provides the
ARB with reason to suspect that the supercharger will affect the durability of the emission
control systems, Toyota Racing Development shall be required to submit durability data to
show that the durability of the vehicle emission control system is not, in fact, affected and/or
that the add—on or modified part demonstrates adequate durability.

In addition to the foregoing, the ARB reserves the right in the future to review this Executive
Order and the exemption provided herein to assure that the exempted add—on or modified part
continues to meet the standards and procedures of Title 13, California Code of Regulations,
Section 2222, et seq.


        «TOYOTA RACING DEVELOPMENT—SUPERCHARGER SYSTEM—D—425—10


                                               —3—


THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION,
ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR
RESOURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING
ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF THE TOYOTA RACING
DEVELOPMENT‘S SUPERCHARGER SYSTEM.

No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by the Air Resources Board", may be made with
respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication.

Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this order. The
order may be revoked only after a ten—day written notice of intention to revoke the order, in
which period the holder of the order may request in writing a hearing to contest the proposed
revocation. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held within ten days of receipt of the request
and the order may not be revoked until a determination is made after the hearing that grounds
for revocation exist.                                                            '

Executed at El Monte, California, this Zété day of August 2002



                                        dT&M G_—Gy
                                           len Lyons, Chief
                                         Mobile Source Operations Division




        TOYOTA RACING DEVELOPMENT—SUPERCHARGER SYSTEM—D—425—10



Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:41:40
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:41:40

Previous E.O. D-425-9 | Previous E.O. D-424 | Next E.O. D-425-11 | Next E.O. D-426