Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on April 24, 2000.
As of Thursday, January 2nd, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

ModelsModification
1980 through 2000 Toyota trucks equipped with the 4 cylinder EFI engine: P/N 16-579008, 1980 through 1995, and P/N 16-579100, 1996 through 2000The Tacoma Pro Filter is a K&N style open element air filter system designed to replace the stock air filter with its ducting and housing. The new filter mounts to the air flow meter.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-462-2
  • Executive Order 462-2 / D462-2
  • ARB # D-462-2
  • Executive Order No: D-462-2
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-462-2
  • Resolution D-462-2
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-462-2 PDF

D-462-2 Document:

CARB_D-462-2

(Page 1 of 2) State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—462—2 Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code LC ENGINEERING, INC. TACOMA PRO FILTER Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Section 39515 and Section 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—45—9; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the installation of the Tacoma Pro Filter, manufactured and marketed by LC Engineering, Inc., 1880—B Commander Drive, Lake Havasu City, Arizona 86403 has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the applicable vehicle pollution control system and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for the following 1980 through 2000 Toyota trucks equipped with the 4 cylinder EFI engine: P/N 16—579008, 1980 through 1995, and P/N 16—579100, 1996 through 2000. The Tacoma Pro Filter is a K&N style open element air filter system designed to replace the stock air > filter with its ducting and housing. The new filter mounts to the air flow meter. This Executive Order is valid provided that the installation instructions for the Tacoma Pro Filter will not recommend tuning the vehicle to specifications different from those of the vehicle manufacturer. This Executive Order shall not apply to any LC Engineering, Inc. Tacoma Pro Filter advertised, offered for sale, sold with, or installed on, a motor vehicle prior to or concurrent with transfer to an ultimate purchaser. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the Tacoma Pro Filter, as exempt by the Air Resources Board, which adversely affect the performance of the vehicle‘s pollution control system shall invalidate this Executive Order. Marketing of the Tacoma Pro Filter using any identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of the Tacoma Pro Filter for an application other than those listed in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources Board. Exemption of the Tacoma Pro Filter shall not be construed as exemption to sell, offer for sale, or advertise any component of the kit as an individual device. This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect the use of the Tacoma Pro Filter may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer.

LC ENGINEERING, INC. Executive Order D—462—2 Tacoma Pro Filter (Page 2 of 2) This Executive Order is granted based on an engineering evaluation which determined that the Tacoma Pro Filter will have no adverse impact on evaporative or tailpipe emissions if tested in accordance with the Cold—Start CVS—75 Federal Test Procedure. Furthermore, LC Engineering, Inc. demonstrated, using a 1999 Toyota 2.4L truck, that the Tacoma Pro Filter did not affect the ability of the vehicle‘s OBD II system to monitor various emission related functions. However, the ARB finds that reasonable grounds exist to believe that use of the Tacoma Pro Filter may adversely affect emissions of motor vehicles when operating under conditions outside the parameters of the previouslyprescribed test procedures. Accordingly, the ARB reserves the right to conduct additional emission tests, in the future, as such tests are developed, that will more adequately measure emissions from all cycle phases. If such test results demonstrate that the Tacoma Pro Filter adversely affect emissions during off—cycle conditions (defined as those conditions which are beyond the parameters of the Cold—Start CVS—75 Federal Test Procedure), this Executive Order shall be effectively rescinded as of the date the test results are validated. Further, if such test results or other evidence provides the ARB with reason to suspect that the Tacoma Pro Filter will affect the durability of the emission control system, LC Engineering, Inc. shall be required to submit durability data to show that the durability of the vehicle emission control system is not, in fact, affected and/or that the add—on or modified part demonstrates adequate durability. In addition to the foregoing, the ARB reserves the right in the future to review this Executive Order and the exemption provided herein to assure that the exempted add—on or modified part continues to meet the standards and procedures of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Section 2222, et seq. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, — APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF LC ENGINEERING, INC‘S TACOMA PRO FILTER. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by the Air Resources Board", may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this order. The order may be revoked only after a ten—day written notice of intention to revoke the order, in which period the holder of the order may request in writing a hearing to contest the proposed revocation. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held within ten days of receipt of the request and the order may not be revoked until a determination after hearing that grounds for revocation exist. Executed at El Monte, California, this ;2%7( ay of April 2000. M'obile Source Operations Division


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:39:55
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:39:55

Previous E.O. D-462-1 | Previous E.O. D-461 | Next E.O. D-462-3 | Next E.O. D-463