Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on October 11, 1985.
As of Monday, October 21st, 2024 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Models
1983-1985 model-year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy-duty diesel engine.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-140-9
  • Executive Order 140-9 / D140-9
  • ARB # D-140-9
  • Executive Order No: D-140-9
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-140-9
  • Resolution D-140-9
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-140-9 PDF

D-140-9 Document:

CARB_D-140-9

(Page 1 of 2) State of California AIR RESQURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—140—9 Relating to Exemptions under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code SPEARCO PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC. "INTERCOOLED TURBOCHARGER KIT FOR FORD VEKICLES POWERED BY A 6.9 LITER INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER HEAVY—DUTY DIESEL ENGINE Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Sections 39515 and 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—45—5; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the installation of the add—on intercooled turbocharger kit (using a Rajay/Rotomaster turbocharger.with an A/R ratio of 1.0) for heavy—duty Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine manufactured by Spearco Performance Products, Inc., of 7541 Woodman Place, Van Nuys, California 91405, has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of required motor vehicle pollution control devices and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for 1983 through 1985 model—year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine. This Executive Order is valid provided that installation instructions for this device will not recommend tuning t>e vehicle to specifications different from those submitted by the device manufacturer. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the device, as exempted by the Air Resources Board, that adversely affect the performance of a vehicle‘s pollution control system shall invalidate this Executive Order. Marketing of this device using an identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of this device for an application other than those listed in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources Board. Exemption of a kit shall not be construed as an exemption to sell, offer for sale, or advertise any component of a kit as an individual device. This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect that the use of this device may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer.

SPEARCO PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC. EXECUTIVE ORDER D—140—9 (Page 2 of 2) THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESQURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF THE SPEARCOQ PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., INTERCOOLED TURBOCHARGER KIT FOR INSTALLATION FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLES POWERED BY A 6.9 LITER INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER HEAVY—DUTY DIESEL ENGINE. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by Air Resources Board" may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication. Section 17500 of the Business and Professions Code makes untrue or misleading advertising unlawful, and Section 17534 makes violation punishable as a misdemeanor. Section 43644 of ‘the Health and Safety Code provides as follows: "43644. (a) No person shall install, sell, offer for sale, or advertise, or, except in an application to the state board for certification of a _ device, represent, any device as a motor vehicle pollution control device for use on any used motor vehicle unless that device has been certified by the state board. No person shall sell, offer for sale, advertise, or represent any motor vehicle pollution control device as a certified device which, in fact, is not a certified device. Any violation of this subdivision is a misdemeanor." ' Any apparent violation of the conditions of this Executive Order will be submitted to the Attorney General of California for such action as he deems advisable. Executed at E1 Monte, California, this //> day of October, 1985. {}//z//f\\ \\ K. D. Drachand, Chief Mobile Source Division

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EVALUATION OF SPEARCO PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.‘S ADD—ON INTERCOOLED TURBOCHARGER KIT FOR INSTALLATIQN IN FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEKICLES POWERED BY A 6.9 LITER INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER HEAVY—DUTY DIESEL ENGINE October, 1985

EVALUATIQON OF SPEARCO PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.‘S ADD—ON INTERCOOLED TURBOCHARGER KIT FOR INSTALLATION IN FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLES POWERED BY A 6.9 LITER INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER HEAVY—DUTY DIESEL ENGINE by Mobile Source Division State of California Air Resources Board 9528 Telstar Avenue E1 Monte, CA 91731 (This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.)

SUMMARY Spearco Performance Products, Inc. has requested an exemption from the prohibitions in Vehicle Code Section 27156 for their add—on intercooled turbocharger kit. The intercooled turbocharger kit is intended for installation on 1983 through 1985 model—year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine. Spearco has submitted data from comparative (stock baseline versus turbocharged) emission tests conducted on a 1984 Ford F—350XL heavy—duty diesel truck. Based on the results from comparative exhaust emission tests performed by Spearco, the staff concludes that Spearco‘s intercooled turbocharger kit evaluated will not adversely affect exhaust emissions from vehicles for which exemption is requested. The staff reeommends that Spearco be granted an exemption for their — add—on intercooled turbocharger kit for installation on 1983 through 1985 model~year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine. The staff also recommends that Executive Order D—140—9 be issued.

CONTENTS Page Number SUMMARY i CONTENTS 11 1. INTRODUCTION 1 II. CONCLUSION 1 III. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 IV. TURBOCHARGER KIT DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 2 V. TURBOCHARGER KIT EVALUATION 3 VI. DISCUSSION 3 11

EVALUATION OF SPEARCOQ PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.‘S ADD—ON INTERCOOLED TURBOCHARGER KIT FOR INSTALLATION IN FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEKHICLES POWERED BY A 6.9 LITER INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER HEAVY—DUTY DIESEL ENGINE I. INTRODUCTION Spearco Performance Products, Inc., of 7541 Woodman Place, Van Nuys, California 91405, has requested an exemption from the prohibitions in Vehicle Code Section 27156 for their add—on intercooled turbocharger kit. The intertcooled turbocharger kit is intended for installation on 1983 through 1985 model—year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine. Spearco has submitted data from comparative (stock baseline versus turbocharged) emission tests conducted on a 1984 Ford F—350XL heavy—duty ~ diesel truck at FCI International Testing Laboratory in Santa Ana, California. II. CONCLUSION Based on the results from comparative exhaust emission tests performed by Spearco at an independent laboratory on a 1984 Ford F—350XL truck, the staff concludes that Spearco‘s intercooled turbocharger kit evaluated will not adversely affect exhaust emissions from vehicles for which exemption is requested. III. RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends that Spearco be granted an exemption for their add—on intercooled turbocharger kit for installation on 1983 through 1985 model—year Ford Motor Company vehicles powered by a 6.9 liter International Harvester heavy—duty diesel engine. The staff also recommends that Executive Order D—140—9 be issued.

IV. TURBOCHARGER KIT DESCRIPTION The purpose of turbocharging an engine is to increase the volumetric efficiency of a engine by forcing more air into an engine than it would take in under stock (non—turbocharged) OEM conditions. An intercooler manifold is added to reduce the temperature of the compressed intake air going into the engine. The major components of the Spearco intercooled turbocharger kit are a 1.0 A/R ratio Rajay/Rotomaster turbocharger, an exhaust manifold to turbocharger adaptor, an intercooler manifold, and an intake manifold bonnet. The components are packaged with installation hardware and instructions and sold as a kit. The QEM exhaust manifold (left bank) is replaced by the Spearco exhaust manifold to turbocharger adaptor. The turbine inlet mounts directly to the replacement exhaust manifold. Intake air is routed from the air cleaner assembly to the compressor. Compressed air is then piped through the intercooler manifold into the engine. For optimum performance of the turbocharger kit, the fuel pump is recalibrated for increased fuel delivery. Spearco recommends that the fuel delivery rate be increased by 12%. This can be accomplished by rotating the adjusting screw 150°. Maximum positive manifold pressure (boost) is limited to 10 psig by the size of {and the speed of exhaust flow through ) the turbine housing. No wastegate or other active boost limiting device is used. Lubrication and cooling of the turbocharger is provided by oil hosed from the oi1 pressure sending unit. Oil from the turbocharger is returned to the oil pan. All OEM emission controls are left intact. 1 p ~

V. TURBOCHARGER KIT EVALUATION Evaluation of the Spearco add—on intercooled turbocharger kit consisted of comparative (without and with the kit installed on the test vehicle) exhaust emission tests. A 1984 Ford F—350XL was used for generating the test data from steady—state tests as per adopted "Criteria for Evaluation of Add—On Parts and Modified Parts; Criteria for Testing Aftermarket Turbochargers". A summary of the data from comparative tests is shown in Table 1. Table 1 Spearco‘s Emission Test Data Evaluation of Spearco‘s Add—On Intercooled Turbocharger Steady—State Tests Exhaust Emissions (ppm) Mode HC CO NOx Baseline Idle 200 140 22 Turbo Idle . 110 140 33 Baseline 20 mph 510 977 . 95 Turbo 20 mph A03 870 44 Baseline 30 mph 380 803 99 Turbo 30 mph 320 733 43 Baseline 40 mph 200 420 102 Turbo 40 mph 203 403 33 Baseline 50 mph 290 581 141 Turbo 50 mph 235 458 40 Baseline 55 mph 305 587 161 Turbo 55 mph 245 468 53 VI. DISCUSSION A summary of the comparative emission data is tabulated in Table 1. The data indicates that exhaust emissios are lower with the turbocharger kit than without the kit, except a slight increase in oxides of nitrogen {NOx) emissions during idle. In general, the data demonstrates compliance with the requirements for the exemption. Due to limited resources, ARB did not perform confirmatory tests. 2o3 ~


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:14:19
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:14:19

Previous E.O. D-140-8 | Previous E.O. D-139 | Next E.O. D-140-10 | Next E.O. D-141