Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on June 26, 1997.
As of Monday, May 12th, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Part NumberModels
M-6049-D461996 -1997 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-308-6
  • Executive Order 308-6 / D308-6
  • ARB # D-308-6
  • Executive Order No: D-308-6
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-308-6
  • Resolution D-308-6
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-308-6 PDF

D-308-6 Document:

CARB_D-308-6

(Page 1 of 2) State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—308—6 Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code FORD SPECIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS "HIGH PERFORMANCE CYLINDER HEAD P/N M—6049—D46" WHEREAS, Vehicle Code Sections 27156 and 38391, and Title 13, California Code of Reqgulations (hereafter "CCR") Section 2222 (e), authorize the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and its Executive Officer to exempt add—on and modified aftermarket devices from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156. WHEREAS, Ford Motor Company Special Vehicle Operations (Ford SVO) of 17000 Southfield Road, Allen Park, Michigan 48101, has applied to the ARB for exemption from the prohibitions in Vehicle Code Sections 27156 and 38391 for their High Performance Cylinder Head (HPCH) for installation on 1996 and 1997 4.6L Ford Mustang GT. WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority vested in the Executive Officer by Health and Safety Code Section 39515 and in the Chief, Mobile Source Operations Division by Health and Safety Code Section 39516 and Executive Order G—45—9, the ARB finds that the above add—on device complies with the California Vehicle Code Section 27156 and Title 13, California Code of Regulations. Emission performance of the HPCH was —based on cold—start CVS—75 tests conducted at an independent vehicle test laboratory. It has not been determined what effect use of the HPCH may have on any warranty, either expressed or implied, by the manufacturer or a motor vehicle on which the device is installed. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the above HPCH is exempt from the prohibitions in Vehicle Code Section 27156 for installation on the approved application vehicles subject to the following conditions: 1. No changes are permitted to the HPCH device as described in the application for exemption. Any changes to the HPCH or any of its components, and other factors addressed in this order must be evaluated and approved by the ARB prior to marketing in California. 2. Marketing of the HPCH using identification other than those shown in this Executive Order or marketing of the HPCH for application other than the one listed in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the ARB. Exemption of this product shall not be construed as an exemption to sell, offer for sale, or advertise any components of the HPCH device as individual devices.

FORD SPECIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS EXECUTIVE ORDER D—308—6 "HIGH PERFORMANCE CYLINDER HEAD" (Page 2 of 2) 3. Any oral or written references to this Executive Order or its content by Ford SVO, its principals, agents, employees, distributors, dealers, or other representatives must include the disclaimer that the Executive Order or the exemption it provides is not an endorsement or approval of any emissions reduction claims for the HPCH and is only a finding that the HPCH is exempt from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF THE HPCH. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this order. The order may be revoked only after ten day written notice of intention to revoke it, during which period the holder of the order may request in writing a hearing to contest the proposed revocation. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held within ten days of receipt of the request, and the order may not be revoked until a determination is made, after the hearing, that grounds for revocation exist. j£> ' »—— Executed at El Monte, California, this &é day of June 1997. Nb faslhs f~— R\B. Summerfield, Chief Mobile Source Operations Division


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:41:24
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:41:24

Previous E.O. D-308-5 | Previous E.O. D-307 | Next E.O. D-308-7 | Next E.O. D-309