Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on August 26, 2009.
As of Thursday, December 26th, 2024 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Models
1995 and older vehicles

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-57-21
  • Executive Order 57-21 / D57-21
  • ARB # D-57-21
  • Executive Order No: D-57-21
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-57-21
  • Resolution D-57-21
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-57-21 PDF

D-57-21 Document:

CARB_D-57-21

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD > EXECUTIVE ORDER D—57—21 . Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156 of the California Vehicle Code Pertronix, Inc. Flame-Thrower Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and . Flame—Thrower HV Ignition Coils Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Section 39515 and Section 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and 'EXecutive Order G—02—003; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the installation of the Flame—Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils, manufactured _ and marketed by Pertronix, Inc., 440 E. Arrow Highway, San Dimas, California 91773, has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the applicable vehicle pollution control systems and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section— 27156 of the Vehicle Code for all 1995 and older vehicles. This exemption is issued based on information supplied by the device manufacturer which demonstrates that the Flame—Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC — and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils meet the compliance criteria for ignition systems as mebre ; 1 specified under "Procedures for Exemption of Add—On and MOdlfled Parts" and therefore, will not | increase emissions. This Executive Order is valid provided that the installation instructions for the Flame—Thrower," _ _ | Flame—Thrower I!I, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils | will not recommend tuning the vehlcle to spemflca’uons different from those submitted by the: device manufacturer. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the Flame—Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, _ Flame—Thrower I!I, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower—HV ignition coils, as exempt by the Air Resources Board, which adversely affect the performance of the vehicle‘s pollution control — | system shall invalidate this Executive Order. > Marketing of the Flame—Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils using any identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of the Flame—Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils for an application other than those listed in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources | % Board.

3. 10222 22222222 morn e n 9 —~ _ 22c 2l This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect the use of the Flame— Thrower, Flame—Thrower II, Flame—Thrower III, Flame—Thrower HC and Flame—Thrower HV ignition coils may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF THE FLAME—THROWER, FLAME—THROWER II, FLAME—THROWER III, FLAME—THROWER HC AND FLAME—THROWER HV IGNITION COILS. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by the Air Resources Board", may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this order. The order may be revoked only after a ten—day written notice of intention to revoke the order, in which period the holder of the order may request in writing a hearing to contest the proposed revocation. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held within ten days of receipt of the request and the order may not be revoked until a determination is made after the hearing that grounds for revocation exist. Executed at El Monte, California, this Zé day of August, 2009 RtSoer— Annette Hebert, Chief Mobile Source Operations Division PERTRONIX, INC. —IJGNITION COILS — D—57—21


Document Created: 2011-07-20 16:28:18
Document Modified: 2011-07-20 16:28:18

Previous E.O. D-57-20 | Previous E.O. D-56 | Next E.O. D-57-22 | Next E.O. D-58