Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on February 25, 1982.
As of Sunday, December 22nd, 2024 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Part NumberModels
No. 3-00121982 model year BMW 633i and 733i models having a 195.9 cubic inch displacement six-cylinder engine.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-97-12
  • Executive Order 97-12 / D97-12
  • ARB # D-97-12
  • Executive Order No: D-97-12
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-97-12
  • Resolution D-97-12
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-97-12 PDF

D-97-12 Document:

CARB_D-97-12

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—97—12 Relating to Exemptions under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code BAE TURBOCHARGER KIT NO. 3—0012 Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Sections 39515 and 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—45—5; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That the instailation of the BAE turbocharger kit number 3—0012 manufactured by BAE of 3032 Kashiwa Street, Torrance, California, 90505 has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of required motor vehicle pollution control devices and, therefore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for 1982 model—year BMW 6331 and 733i models having a 195.9 cubic inch displacement six—cylinder engine. This Executive Order is valid provided that installation instructions for this device will not recommend tuning the vehicle to specifications different from those submitted by the device manufacturer. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the device, as exempted by the Air Resources Board, that adversely affect the performance of a vehicle‘s pollution control system shall invalidate this Executive Order. Marketing of this device using an identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of this device for an application other than those listed in this Executive Order shall be pronibited unjless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources Board. Exemption of a kit shall not be construed as an exemption to sell, offer for sale or advertise any component of a kit as an individual device. This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect that the use of this device may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF THE BAE TURBOCHARGER KIT NO. 3—0012. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by Air Resources Board" may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication.

BAE ‘ Executive Order D—97—12 TURBOCKHARGER KIT NO. 3—0012 (Page 2 of ?) Section 17500 of the Business and Professions Code makes untrue or misleading advertising unlawful, and Section 17534 makes violation punishable as a misdemeanor. Section 43644 of the Health and Safety Code provides as follows: "43644. (a) No person shall install, sell, offer for sale, or advertise, or, except in an application to the state board for certification of a device, represent, any device as a motor vehicle pollution control device for use on any used motor vehicle unless that device has been certified by the state board. No person shall sell, offer for sale, advertise, or represent any motor vehicle pollution control device as a certified device which, in fact, is not a certified device. Any violation of this subdivision is a misdemeanor." Any apparent violation of the conditions of this Executive Order will be submitted to the Attorney General of California for such action as he deems advisable. Executed at El Monte, California, this 2584 day of Fe . 1982. lé. /D%hand , Chief Mobile Source Control Division

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD Staff Report February 19, 1982 Evaluation of the BAE Turbocharger Kit No. 3—0012 for Compliance with the Requirements of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code I. INTRODUCTION BAE of 3032 Kashiwa Street, Torrance, California 90505, has requested by letter dated November 4, 1981, an update to the existing Air Resources Board‘s Executive Order (E.0.) No. D—97—7. The applicant requested that their add—on turbocharger kit, kit number 3—0012, be exempted from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code (V.C.) Section 27156 for the 1982 BMW 6331 and 7331 model vehicles powered by a 195.9 cubic inch displacement (CID) six—cylinder gasoline engine. II. TURBOCHARGER KIT DESCRIPTION The detailed description of the turbocharger kit is given in the ARB Staff Report titled "Evaluation of the BAE Turbocharger Kit No. 3—0000W!1 for Compliance with the Requirements of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code", dated October 7, 1981. III. DISCUSSION BAE turbocharger kit number 3—0000W1 applicable to 1980 and 1981 model—years BMW 6331 and 733i models powered by a 195.9 CID gasoline engine was granted an exemption (E.0. No. D—97—7) on October 7, 1981. The exemption was granted on the basis that the effectiveness of the vehicle‘s pollution control system was not reduced.

The applicant is making available an add—on turbocharger kit for the 1982 models. The kit for the 1982 models, kit number 3—0012, has identical components as kit number 3—0000W1 except for the discharger pipe (pipe for routing intake air from the turbocharger compressor outlet into the intake plenum). Although the discharge pipes are bent differently, to accomodate the engine compartment on the newer vehicles, the two kits are identical in operation and performance. The applicant has requested that the exemption be updated to include the 1982 model vehicles. In response to the request, the staff compared the BMW engine design of both (1981 and 1982) model—years. In particular, the effects, if any, the turbocharger kit would have on the vehicle‘s emissions. Since the staff noticed that the 1982 engines are designed with a significantly higher nominal compression ratio (8.8:1 compared to 8.0:1), additional emissions testing was requested to assure that the kit will not adversely affect exhaust emissions. The applicant performed comparative emissions tests on a 1982 BMW 7331 vehicle. The emissions test data submitted by the applicant are as follows: Table 1 Applicant‘s Emissions Test Data Fuel Exhaust Emissions (g/mi) Economy Test HC CO NOx (mpg) Baseline CVS—75 0. 32 1.39 0.25 16.3 Device CVS—75 0. 36 1.41 0.25 16.3



Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:40:42
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:40:42

Previous E.O. D-97-11 | Previous E.O. D-96 | Next E.O. D-97-13 | Next E.O. D-98