Approval Details

Unknown Validity

Validity


As of Monday, January 20th, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded. Warning: This Executive Order record has not yet been synced with arb.parts system.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-182-26
  • Executive Order 182-26 / D182-26
  • ARB # D-182-26
  • Executive Order No: D-182-26
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-182-26
  • Resolution D-182-26
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-182-26 PDF

D-182-26 Document:


CARB_D-182-26

                                                                                     (Page 1 of 2)

                                     State of California
                                     AIR RESOURCES      BOARD

                                   EXECUTIVE ORDER D—~182—26
                         Relating to Exemptions Under; Section 27156
                                     of the Vvehicle Code

                                WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
                        "THREE—WAY CATALYTIC CONVERTER SERIES 96000"

WHEREAS, Vehicle Code Sections 27156 and 38391;, and Title 13, California  Code
of Reqgulations (hereafter "CCR")} Section 2222(h), authorize the California
Air Resources Board (ARB) and its Executive Officer to exempt new aftermarket
catalytic converter from the prohibitions of V?hicle Code Section 27156.

WHEREAS,     Walker Manufacturing Company        (Walker}iof 2701 N.        Dettman Road,
Jackson, Michigan 49201, has applied to the ARB for exemption from the
prohibitions in Vehicle Code Sections 27156 and 38391 to market their
aftermarket series 96000 three—way catalytic converter (TWC) for the following
application,        except for vehicles equipped with: an OBD II system:

Type          Use          Series No.    Max.   Eng.   Size§     Max.   Test Veh.   Wt.
TWC           TWC          96000         5.9L (360 CID)!|        6,000 1bs.
TWC           oC           96000         5.9L (360 CID)          6,000 i1bs.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority vested in the Executive Officer by Health
and Safety Code Section 39515 and in the Chlefl                 Mobile Source Operations
Division by Health and Safety Code Section 39516 and Executive Order G—45—9,
the ARB finds that the above aftermarket catalytic converter complies with the
California Vehicle Code Section 27156 and Title 13, California Code of
Regulations, Section 2222(h).   Emission perfor@ance of the catalytic converter
was based on durability bench—aging of the catalyst using AlliedSignal
Environmental Catalyst (ASEC) bench—aging cycle ARL—102 (RAT B) for 53 hours,
accepted by the ARB,        for this application, to be equivalent to 25,000 miles
durability mileage accumulation using AMA drlving cycle (Reference Appendlx
IV, Title 40, part 86, Code of Federal Regulathons (June 28, 1977))

Whereas, emissions tests conducted at Automotive Testing and Development
Services (ATDS)}), Ontario, showed the following, conversion efficiencies which
meet the minimum requirements for new aftermarket catalytic converters:

                                     Catalyst Application Type
Pollution Component                    TWC         OC
HC:    Min. Requirement                 70%             70%
       Walker‘s series 96000            84 .5           82 .1
CO:—   Min. Requirement                 70              70 |
       Walker‘s series 96000            74 .2           85 .0
NOx:   Min. Requirement                 50              —
       Walker‘s series 96000            82.9            —
                                                            t
IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the above catalyticiconverter is exempt                        from the
prohibitions in Vehicle Code Section 27156 foranstallatlon on the approved
application vehicles subject to the following conditions:

        1.      No changes are permitted to the catalytic converter as described
                in the application for exemption. i Any changes to the catalytic
                converter or any of its components}, and other factors addressed                     in
                this order must be evaluated and approved by the ARB prior to
                marketing in California.


WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY                  EXECUTIVE ORDER D—182—26
"TWC SERIES 96000°"                           (Pagei{ 2 of 2)



      2.    Marketing of the catalytic convertéer using identifications other
            than those shown in the exemption application, and in this
            Executive Order, or marketing of the catalytic converter for
            application other than the ones shown in this Executive Order
            shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the
            ARB.   Exemption of this product shall not be construed as an
            exemption to sell, offer for sale,:or advertise any components of
            the catalytic converter as individual devices.

      3.    Any oral or written references to this Executive Order or its
            content by Walker Manufacturing Company, its principals, agents,
            employees, distributors, dealers, or other representatives must
            include the disclaimer that the Ex@écutive Order or the exemption
            it provides is not an endorsement or approval of any emission
            reduction claims for the catalytic; converter and is only a finding
            that the catalytic converter is exempt from the prohibitions of
            vehicle Code Section 27156.                  i
      4.    Walker Manufacturing Company installation instructions for the new
            catalytic converter must conform to requirements                        in Paragraphs I
            and IX of California Evaluation Procedures for New Aftermarket
            Non—Original Equipment Catalytic Converters.

      5.    Upon installation,   the catalytic converter must carry a
            manufacturer‘s warranty     for   25,000 miles             on   the    substrates   and
            50,000 miles or five years on the shell and end pipes.

violation of any of the above conditions shallibe grounds for revocation of
this order.  The order may be revoked only after ten day written notice of
intention to revoke it, during which period the holder of the order may
request in writing a hearing to contest the proposed revocation.  If a hearing
is requested, it shall be held within ten days‘of receipt of the request, and
the order may not be revoked until a determination is made, after the hearing,
that grounds for revocation exist.

Executed at El Monte,   California,   this    [d    la            y‘        pber    1998.




                                         R.B. Summerfield, Chief
                                         Mobile So@rce Operations Division




                                                             1
                                                             i
                                                             1
                                                             }
                                                             |
                                                             1
                                                             t

                                                             (v

                                                             1
                                                             f


                EVALUATION OF WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY‘S SERIES 96000 NEW AFTERMARKET
                   THREE—WAY CATALYTIC CONVERTER FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE PROEIBITIONS IN
weviite




                           VEHICLE CODE SECTION 27156, AND TITLE 13, CALIFORNIA
                                    CODE OF REGULATIONS SECTION 2222(h)




                                                December 1998




                                                      by


                                      Mobile Source Operations Division
                                          Aftermarket Parts Section
                                              9528 Telstar Avenue
                                           El Monte, CA   91731—2990




          (This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and
          approved for publication.   Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
          reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade
          names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.)


                                               SUMMARY


              Walker Manufacturing Company (Walker) of 2701 N. Dettman Road, Jackson,

Michigan 49201, has applied for an exemption of their new series 96000 aftermarket

three—way catalytic converter      ({TWC)   from the prohibitions   in Vehicle Code Section

27156,   in accordance with California reqgulations on new aftermarket catalytic

converters.     The two test catalysts were aged using AlliedSignal Environmental

Catalyst   (ASEC‘s)   bench—aging cycle,    ARL—102.     Each converter can contains one round

substrate of ceramic monolith type.         The substrate is coated with palladium and

rhodium.   The new catalytic converter may be installed on TWC and OC vehicles powered

by an engine of 5.9L or less,     and having an equivalent test weight of 6,000 lbs.            or

less.

              Emissions data submitted by the applicant show that the catalytic converter

meets the fequirements of Vehicle Code Section 27156 and Title 13,           California Code of

Regulations,    Section 2222(h)   for the stated application.       Based on the above,   the

staff recommends that the exemption be granted as requested and that Executive Order

D—182—26 be issued.


                            CcOoNTENTS

                                         Number

       SUMMARY                              i

       coNTENTS                            i1

       INTRODUCTION

II.    cOoNCLUSION

III.   RECOMMENDATION

IV.    DEVICE DESCRIPTION

v.     DEVICE EVALUATION




                                1i


              EVALUATION OF WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY‘S SERIES 96000 NEW AFTERMARKET
                THREE—WAY CATALYTIC CONVERTER FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE PROHIBITIONS IN
                         VEHICLE CODE SECTION 27156, AND TITLE 13, CALIFORNIA
                                  CODE OF REGULATIONS SECTION 2222(h)
ce




     I.            PNTRODUCTION

                   Walker Manufacturing Company         (Walker}   of 2701 N.   Dettman Road,     Jackson,

     Michigan 49201,    has applied for an exemption from the prohibitions                  in Vehicle Code

     Ssection 27156 for their new series 96000 aftermarket three—way catalytic converter

     (TWC)}   in accordance with California reqgulations on new aftermarket catalytic

     converters.     The ceramic monolith substrate of the new catalyst was manufactured by

     AlliedSignal Environmental Catalyst (ASEC).             The new aftermarket catalyst is intended

     for the following vehicle application:


     Converter Type     Converter Use       PN/Series         Max. Eng.       Max. Veh.
                                                              Size           Test Wt.
     TWC                TWC                 96000             5. 9L          6,000 lbs.
     TWC                oC                  96000             5.9L           6,000   lbs.



     Walker intends to market the new TWC as a replacement for catalytic converters on

     applicable vehicles whose manufacturers‘ warranty has expired and the need for

     replacement of the original equipment manufacturer              (OEM}   catalytic converter has been

     established and documented.          Excluded from the application are those vehicles equipped

     with an On—Board Diagnostic System II          (OBD—II)}.

     II.           concLUSION

                   The applicant has submitted all the required information,                 and based on the

     applicant‘s submitted exhaust emissions test data,              the staff concludes that the new

     aftermarket catalyst meets the criteria set forth in Vehicle Code Section 27156,                       and

     Title 13,    California Code of Requlations,         Section 2222(h)     for the stated application.

     III.          RECOMMENDATIOfi

                   Staff recommends that the exemption be granted as requested and that

     Executive Order No.      D—182—26 be issued,       permitting the advertisement,         sale,   and

     installation of the new aftermarket catalyst on applicable vehicles.

     IV.           DEVICE   DESCRIPTION

                   Walker‘s new aftermarket TWC is designed to use round ceramic monolith

     substrate.     The substrate is coated with palladium and rhodium.                The substrate

     measures 3.66 inches in diameter and 5.00 inches in length,                and has a volume of 52.66

     cubic inches.     The substrate is contained in outer 409 stainless steel shell with

     compressed intumescent mat,       to prevent vibration and exhaust by—pass.               The shell    is

     sealed by seam weld,       and bushings are attached by arc welding.             Aluminized soft steel

     heat shield is spot—welded to the upper and bottom sides of the converter to protect


vehicle underbody from excessive heat,               and prevent materials on the ground from direct

contact with the catalyst shell.             The catalyst may be sold as a unit with installation

instructions or may be used in customizsed direct                  fit exhaust application.          It   is also

sold with a warranty for 25,000 miles on the substrate,                     and five years or 50,000 miles

on the container or shell, and the end pipes.

v.            DEVICE EVALUATION

              Walker submitted data from testing conducted by Automotive Testing and

Development Services       (ATDS),    Ontario,   California.         The test catalysts were aged by

AlliedSignal Environmental Catalyst using their ARL—102 bench—aging cycle.                            The test

catalysts were shipped directly to ATDS where the emissions tests were conducted for

three—way     (TWC)   application using a 1995 Dodge 2500 Ram Truck 5.9L.                      The oxidation

catalytic converter (OC)       application tests were conducted on a 1979 Ford Pickup Truck

7.6L,.   However,     the use of the 7.6L Ford Truck for the 0C testing will not change the

application limits of the Walker‘s series 96000 TWC as shown above.                            All tests were

conducted at the       equivalent    test   weight    (ETW)   of   6,000   lbs.   The   test   vehicles     were

ballasted in order to achieve the required ETW of 6,000 pounds.                         The test catalysts

were labeled 6971 and 6972.

              Testing consisted of two cold—start CVS—75 with a simulator                        ("dummy"

catalyst}),   followed by two cold—start CVS—75               for each of the test catalysts.             Upon

completion of testing at the independent laboratory,                   the ARB conducted confirmatory

tests for TWC application only at the Haagen—Smit Laboratory in El Monte,                           California.

Results from the.confirmatory tests showed CO conversion efficiency for test catalyst

6971 to be only 60.7 percent which brought the overall performance of                           series 96000 TWC

to 67.2 percent for CO.        The minimum required conversion efficiency is 70 percent.

              Walker speculated that the test catalyst might have been damaged chemically

or mechanically,       and requested to be allowed to open it               for mechanical and chemical

analysis.     The examination showed that the substrate was broken into two pieces.                              It

was not determined whether the damage was caused by a drop of the test catalyst from a

height or by vibration during testing.               Walker requested to be allowed to re—age and

retest another catalyst as a replacement.                The replacement test catalyst was

identified as 7107.        All test results for the series 96000 TWC,                   including ARB‘s

confirmatory tests,       are shown below:


                                         ATDS,   Ontario,   California — First Tests

                                                                TWC

                            Simulator     Cat 6971           Cat 6972       Conv.   Eff.
lasiins.




                           Average        Average            Average        Average
           HC    (g/mi)       2 .234       0.354             0.381          83.5%
           Cco   (g/mi)      22.686        6.711             6.516          70.8%
           NOx   (g/mi})      4.050        0.824             0 .825         79.6%


                                                                  OC
           HC    (g/mi)       8 .082      1.318              1.573          82 .1
           cCO   (g/mi)     165. 302     24.185             24 .777         85 .0

                                Haagen—Smit Laboratory,        El Monte — Confirmatory Tests

           HC    (g/mi)      2 .271        0.431             0.385          82.0
           co    (g/mi)     23.896         9.400             6.268          67.2
           NOx   (g/mi)      3. 149        0.831             0.593          77 .4

                                                   ATDS, Ontario — 2" Tests
                                                                TWC

                           Simulator      Cat 6972           Cat 7107       Conv. Eff.
                           Average        Average            Average        Average
           HC    (g/mi)      2.234        0 .326             0 .366         84.5%
           CO    (g/mi)     22.686        5.205              6.489          74.2%
           NOx   (g/mi)      4 .050       0.526              0 .856         82.9%

           Due to time constraints,        the ARB did not conduct new confirmatory tests on the

           catalytic converter.         Staff recommends that exemption be granted on the basis of

           tests conducted at ATDS,       which showed that both of the test catalysts meet the

           required minimum conversion efficiency.



Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:43:39
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:43:39

Previous E.O. D-182-25 | Previous E.O. D-181 | Next E.O. D-182-27 | Next E.O. D-183