Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on November 13, 1975.
As of Wednesday, February 5th, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Modification
1976 model year and older model year vehicles.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-24-4
  • Executive Order 24-4 / D24-4
  • ARB # D-24-4
  • Executive Order No: D-24-4
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-24-4
  • Resolution D-24-4
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-24-4 PDF

D-24-4 Document:

CARB_D-24-4

State of California AIR RESQURCES LOARD EXECUTIVE OROER D—24—4 Relating to Exemptions uud“r Section 2715 un & of the Vehicle Code LIFT, HiC. "LIFI FUEL FFFIClEuCYCVST Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersicned by Section 38023 of the lealth and Safety Code; > IT IS ORDERED AIiD RESOLYED: That the installation of "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" distributed by Lift, Inc. of 7819 Santa Honica Eivd., Los Angeles, California 90046, has been found to not reduce the effectiveness of motor vehicle pollution control devices and therefore is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for 1976 model—year and older model—year vehicles. This device consists of x plastic bottle, rubber hose, plastic tee for connection into the PCY system, mounting brackets, and bettle cap with a vapor outiet p3r< 1“ccrroraf7fl§ a ,.“2? inch diamoter orifice (Identified by Part ho. E—1) and air inlet port. e composition of the fluid is identified by Kem Krest F]uxc Specification io. 1072. This Executive Order is valid provided that installation instructfons for this device will not recommend tuning the vehicle to specifications different than those listed by the vehicle manufacturer. Changes made to the design cr operating cornditions o exempted by the Air ResourceEo , that adver e of the vehicle‘s po..uLion control sys this Executive Order. Harketing of this device using an identific n other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of this device for am application other than those listed in ive Order s.ai] be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained f R rc es Loard. —

This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect that the use of this device may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES MOYT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR AKRY QTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OFf ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANHT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BEHEFITS OF THE "LIFT FUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM® DEVICE. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by Air Resources Board" may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication. Section 17500 of the Business and Professions Code—makes unlawful, untrue or misleading advertising, and Section 17534 makes violation punishable as a misdemeanor. Sections 39130 and 39184 of the Health and Safety Code provide as follows: "39130. lio person shall install, sell, offer for sale, or advertise, or, except in an application to the board for certification of a device, represent, any device as a motor vehiclie pollution contrel device unless that device has been certified by the board. lo person shall sell, offer for sale, advertise, or represent any motor vehicle pollution control device as a certified device which, in fact, is not a certified device. Any violation of this section is a misdemeanor." "39184. (a) No person shall install, sell, offer for Ssale, or adver— tise, or, except in an application to the board for accreditation of a device, represent. any device as a motor vehicle pollution control device for use on any used motor vehicle unless that device has been accredited by the board. lio person shall sell, offer for sale, adver— tise, or represent any motor vehicle pollution control device as an accredited device which, in fact, is not an accredited device. Any violation of this subdivision is a misdemearor." Any apparent violation of the conditions of this Executive Order will be submitted to the Attornsy General of California for such action as he deems | advisable. Executive Order D—24—3 dated January 31, 1975 is hereby rescinded. Executed at Sacramento, California, this _\ gijki‘day of Hovember, 1975. WILLIAN H. LEWIS, JR. Executive Officer

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD October 30, 1975 Addendum to the Staff Report Dated December 30, 1974 "Evaluation of Lift, Inc., "Lift Fuel Efficiency System Vapor Injector" — for Exemption from the Prohibitions of Section 27156 of the HNotor Yehicle Code" Introduction — Lift Inc. of Los Angeles, Ca}jfornia has received an exemption from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code under "Executive Order D—24—3 for its "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" vapor injector for 1975 and older model vehicles. A description of the device, test data and other pertinent information in supportof their application for this exemption will be found in the attached staff report dated December 30, 1974. The applicant has requested that this exemption be extended to include the 1976 model vehicles. (Exhibit A). The applicant states that there is no change in the unit or its application. I1. Evaluation The 1976 emission control systems are basically the same a he 1975 systems. c in Since the device has not been changed, the test data and other enginesring considerations applied to the 1975 model vehicles will also be valid for a the 1976 models. The staff has no basts upon which to deny the request. o i the applicant and concurs that the device will not increase emissions from the 1976 model vehicles.

111. Recormendation The staff reqomhends adoption of Executive Order D—24—4 granting Lift Inc. exemption from the prohibition of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for its "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" vapor injector.

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD Staff Report December 30, 1974 Evaluation of the Lift, Inc. "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" Vapor Injector for Compliance with the _Requirements of Section 27156 of the California Motor Yehicle Code Introduction Lift, Inc. of 7819 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, Califormia 90046 has submitted an application requesting an exemption from-Vehic1e. Code Section 27156 (Reference — Exhibit A — Applicatiofi) for the "Lift Fue! Efficiency System". This Section of the Vehicle Code prohibits the installation of any device or mechanism which would adversely affect the performance of the eimission control system. 1 The applicant is requesting to extend their exemption to include the 1975 model year vehicles. Lfft, Inc, was granted an exemption to Vehicle Code Section 27156 by Executive Order D—23—2 dated July 12, f974. ©The staff has previously evaluated this device and found it to have no adverse effect on 1974 and older model—year vehicles (Reference — Exhibitvt and Exhibtt D — January 22, 1974 and July 3, 1974 Staff Reports). II. System Description The "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" is a vafiér injebtor device where the vapor enters the engine through the PCY system {Reference — Exhibit B — Instatation Instructibns). The device consists of a plastic tees,plastic‘botfilej rubber hose, mounting bracksts, and bottle cap containing an 0.022 inch restriction orifice. For a

Evaluation of the Lift, Inc. "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" Yapor Injector for Compliance with the Requirements of Section 27156 of the California _ . December 30, 1974 lotor Vehicle Code description concerning the operation of this device, refer to the staff report dated January 22, 1974 (Reference — Exhibit C). The fluid is a proprietary blend of alcohol and water solution. This fluid is manufactured by Kem Krest Product Cbmpany, 24684 Hathaway, Farmington, Michigan 48024. The composition of this fiuid ‘ is identified by Kem Krest Specification Number 1072 and is on file .with the Air Resources Board. The applicant has requested the fiuid composition be treated as confidential information. III. SystemEvaluation The staff has determined from previous evaluations of vapor injector type devices on pre—1975 model—year vehicles that an increase in ex— haust emissions will not cccur if the vapor bleed rate is limited to O.]d cubic feet per minute {ofm). The vapor bleed rate of the "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" is lHimited to 0.10 cfm by using a 0.022 inch orifice diameter. The staff believes the 0.10 ofm vapor bleed rate would not increase exhaust emissions on the 1975 model—year vehicles. However, the catalytic converter system used on some of the 1975 model— year vehicles can be déegraded by certain chemica] compounds. Based on. the information submitted by the applicanf concerning the fiuid composition, the staff investigated the effects of these chemicals on catalytic con— verters. From.this investigation, the staff ocncludes the Kem EKrest fluid does not contain any chemical compounds which will reduce the effectiveness of the catalyst.

Evaivation of the Lift, Inc. "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" Vapor injector for Compliance with the Requirements of Section 27156 of the California . Motor Vehicle Code December 30, 1974 IV. Conclusion and Recommendation The séaff believes the "Lift Fuel Efficiency Systém" would not have an adverse effect on the emission control system provided that the flow rate is limited to 0.10 cfm and the fiuid is fdentical to those submitted to the staff. The staff recommends that Lift," Inc. be granted an exemption to Section 27156 for the "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" on 1975 and older—model vehicles.

sap nc 222. [Lf “'“’Z"’, [LsT Poras. . Telephone (213) 656—2767 eptember 19, 1 1974 William Simmons, Executive Officer Air Resources Board, State of California 1709 ll1th Street > — sacramento, C,lifornia 95814 Dear kr. Simmons: Enclosed please find our application for exenmption Section 27155 of the Vehicle Code of the State of for vehicles of model year 1975, for your approval. As you know, the 1975 model cars are now being sold and your approval on our application T. for exemption is now being respect— fully requested. Looking forvward to an early reply, I remain. Cordially, LI"T, INC. »4 c . 7A LZJ///?/"//A/(\:”%/BBLes2A_ William Heriton —President wn/zd cc: Richard Kenny James Mikacich

EXNLDIT A {CONT. J TOi William Simmons, Executive Officer Air Resources Board, State of California 1709 lith Street Sacramento, California 95814 Ré: APPLICATION FPOR EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 27156 OP THE VEHICLE CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFPORNIA, FOR VEHICLES OF MODEL YEAR 1975. We, WILLIAM HARITON, individually and as President of LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, and LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, do hereby, apéiy, request, and make application for exemption from the -prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156 for the device commonly kfiownvas LIPT FUEL EFFICEBNCY SYSTEM, an intake manifold vapor bleed. It is'hereby acknowledged that the Air Resources Board has previously issued EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. D—24 on_January 28, 1974, Executive Order _No. D—24—1 on May 17, 1974, and Executive Order No. D—24—2 on July 12, i974; ail of these executive orders relating to the devise commonly known as IJII”I“ FUEL EPFICENCY SYSTEM. Exécutive Order No.er24—2 of July 12, 1974 granted the exemption from the prohibitions of Section 27;56 of the Vehicle.Code for 1974 Model Year Vebicles and older. The purpose of this réquest and application is to continue this exemption for 1975 Model Year Vehicles and oider. LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, has established its home office at 7819 Santa Monica Blvd, Los Angeles,‘Califorpia $0046. Phone Number 213—656—2767. It is proceeding with its marketing and d@istribution of the LIP? PUEL EFFICENCY SYSTEM throughout the State of California in conformity to and subject to all the rules, laws, regula— tions of the State of California and suject to direct control of the pélicies and programs of the Air Resources Board of the State of California.> There are presently no aétions pending by any govcrnmgntal' agency, either federal, state or county against LIFT, INC.,. All th requirements and mandates of the prior executive orders have been and &n

Exhibit A {cont.) aré being abided by and conformed to. The basic discription of the product still remains the same. LIFPT FUEL EFFICENCY SYSTEM 1s a compactunit which can be installed inside the engine compartment of any car or truck. The LIFT PUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM is a vopor induction system. It has a .022 open/shut valve. This set orfice controls the turbulation of the LIFT fuel and therefore, the vapor induged into £he air—gasoline mixture for each combustion. The LIFT open/shut valve does not require adjusting. Basically, LIFT FUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM is‘composed of a Plastic Fuel Reservoir or container; Control Valve, Hose and Connecting device, which(étfaéhes to your carburetor‘s Pollution Control Valve (PVC). Within the reservoir is a firoprietary blend of chemicals that vaporize from a balanced formula.. This vapor is drawn off the air space at the top of the reservoir. It then leads into the carburetor to blend with the gasoline‘s air mixture before it goes into the cylinders. This catalytic action extends the burning time of gasoline, giving you increased combustion efficiency. _This applicatioh, in fact a re—applicafiion, is respectively submitted for immediate consideration. Datedg*_uz;A ;7,), fes )/2 /Z//// * R Respectively submitted //////A/\//(//&/N WIULIAM HARITON, ¢n67v1dua13 and as President of LIFT, INC. A California Corporation

i8¥ kbl 2 Comonpoprieq en yq w en ol co onreoaluiy es ewotee e Gtut _1C.aM uh lc l_ m m . M [Ennnnoeves ces L‘,,‘ y, Mevemn ‘.,7. . » /( uCC l 11 = w Lc * _ M:E a \ o / C | } uopjonugsuf uo}lje{{epsu} g 119 14X3

<* €140, ' Exhibit B {cont.) ¢c LCO\ j /‘ E.l ‘ 1f ho Mount Gracket, Find a con— Install Cut—Washer. Remove Control Valvs. Insert . venient place under your car shipping cap from LIFT Reser— control valve on LIFT Unit. —hood large enough to accom— voir. Roll cut—washer {in plas— Make sure it seats firmly a— modate the LIFT unit, Drifl tic bag) down over base of gainst cut—washer to eliminate two holss through two of the boitle threads until it sits any vacuum leaks, Now in— mounting holes in bracket and firmly at base of threads. sert LIFT Fuel Reservoir into sttach bracket firmly to side mounting bracket. wall of engine compartment with two sheet—metal screws provided. i0 . i N_ Pov.H €.4.€u snn : J \ y / = &

EXMTD1T Lo (Cutta} Connect hose io L1FT unit, Lucate pollution control valve. Insert Connocting "Y". Trace Attach Unit‘s hose to LIFT Locate PCV Hose running PCV Hose to point where it control valve. Be sure it fits from the valve lifter cover enters carburetor. With sharp snugly on nozzle at top. Check directly to base of carburetor, knife, our PCV Hose as close for air leaks. {in some cars, PCV Hoss is to the base of the carburetor, located in manifold on top of s possible. {4" or less for m CAUTION: Make certain black; near oif fill cover; be— best results.) Into cut, inssrt LIFT comnecting hose does side crank case; or on top' appropriate Y fitting. not touch air conditioning rear of valley cover‘y'\IOI NOTE: Three "Y" fitting sizes hases or hot maniolds. For proper PCY identification are provided. insert so leg — chock PCV Hose where it "Y" points toward carburetor. c enters engine. FHose should : Be sure both sides of PCV pull out easily. Be cartain to > hose fit securely against "Y". . ' re—insert PCV Hose before continuing Installation. CAUTION: Never cut or in In some cases, you may have stall unit in brake fine hose to connact to another primary or gasoline line! vacuum source running to the base of the carburetor. mt neazoppcmncrcsa Cl maup Nsb en 2 2+ ge—~ earytt Pucls .2 tes— PCOV. YVALVZ mof oTR . \ a2a2l Ns o

Exhibit B‘ {cont.) o Attach LIFT hose. Take hose Start your engine. THEN running from LIFT Fuel Con— CHECKALL CONNECTIONS troi Valve and attach it tightly FOR VACUUM LEAKS. LIFT to branch of "Y" fitting you has a factory pre—set valve, installed in PCV Hose. This so no adjustment is necessary. compiates LIFT hoolcup in stallation SPECIAL NOTE: If for any reason the valve should be out SPECIAL NOTE: Do not in— of adjustment, to properly stafl the LIFT "Y" connector readjust: close valve, then turn into the primary vactium line counterclacky ons to which the charcout canister half turns, then hand tighten tine is connsc lock nut. 10

Exhibtit B {cont.) FUZL CONTENT inside the plastic bottle is a proprietary fluid, specification No. 1072, consisting of water, alcohols, ketones, aromatic hydrocarbons, and other organic compounds. The control valve which admits vapor to the intake manifold is mounted on the cap of the bottle. This valve has only two positfons —— fully open or fully closed. it has an orifice diameter of .022 inches. The system contains a standpipe which provides venting to the atmos— phere. The same model is used for applications to all vehicles. sSYSTENM FUNCTION As the engine vacuum increases, bubbles are formed at the end of the standpipe due to the venting action. The rising vapor bubbles violently agitate the fluid and tend to increase vaporization. This vaporous—fluid mixture enters the engine through the PCV system, or any primary vacuumsource to base of carburetor. TEAAA CA A T i3R SYSTEM EVALUATION St. Clair Sales and Distribution, Inc., has submitted emission results of CYS tosts performed by Scatt Research Laboratory. The dafa submitted gencrally show no adverse effect on emissions with this device when compared with the bascline date. Based on the information presented and operating characteristics of the system, no incompatibility exists with the accredited oxides of nitrogen retrofit devices. At any time, &.,’F to 60 days from date of purc«msc, you may return the LIFT Unit and receive a full refund, of the purchase price, less installation, FROM THE POINT OF PURCH ASE. L{FT Fucl Efficiency System is guaranteed by St. Clair Sales & Distribution, Inc. against any defect in workmanship or materials AO.:"a period of one year, Linbilities are limited to repiacement o ' parts only. See yourdealer for repairs or replaceme a card must be returned to va

Exhibit B {cont.) IMPORTANT TIPS 1. Check all LH—I’ connections to insure against any vacuum leaks. 2. For best results, have your engine properiy tuned after LIFT instalfation, L1F T\vxll not correct pre—existing engine maifunctions. 3. Be certain to allow time (1,200 to 1,500 miles) for the LIFT System to cleanse your engine before achieving its maximum efficiency. In most cases you can use a fower octane gasoline with a LIFT System! . —— . . & 4. Compare your mileage improvement by.keeping an accurate record on the enclosed warranty card. We would appreciate your comments. When UFT fuel mixture is within 1 or 2 inches from the bottom of the reservoir, carefully replace oil mixture with fresh L{FT Fuel. Old fuel mixture should not be mixed with the new fuel. You should get approximately 2,500 to 4,000 miles per 60—o0zs, of LIFT Fuel, depending on engine cubic—inch displacement. D BY: ——

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD January 22, 1974 Staff Report Evaluation of St. Clair Sales & Distribution, Inc. "Lift Fue]l Efficiency System" {Vapor Injector) for Exemption from the Prohibitons .—= of Section 27156 of the Fotor Vehicle Code Introduction _ St. Clair Sales & Distribution, Inc. of Mt. Clemens, Michigan, has applfie& for exemption from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Hotor Vehicle Code for its "Lift Fuel Efficiency System". This saption prohibits the installation of any device which reduses the effec— tiveness of the motor vehicle emission control system. The applicant is requesting an exemption for 1956—1974 model—year vehicles. Based on statements received from St. Clair Sates, they have exclusive manufacturing and marketing rights to the system described herein. Except for the control valve and fluid, the "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" is the same in all respects as the "Turbo Yapor Injector" which was granted an exemption from the prohibitions of Section 27156 by Executive Order D—2, dated April 17, 1973 for 1970 and older vehicles. H. System Description This devicé consist of a vapor injection system and proprictary fluid which is admitted into the PCY line. A plastic bottle is mounted in the &ngfne compartment with a rubber hose providing the connection between the intake manifold and the device.

St. Clair Sales & Distribution, Inc. January 22, 1974 i‘ ' Inside theiplastic.botfle is a proprietary fluid, specification Ko. 1072, consisting of vater, alcohols, ketones, aromatic hydro— carbons, and other organic compounds. The applicant claims this formulation will enhance engine performance and increase fuel economy. The cofizrol valve which admits vapor to the intake manifold is mounted on the cap of the bottle. This valve—has only two positions — fully open or fully closed. It has an orifice diameter of .022 ~L inches. The system contains a standpipe which provides venting to the atmosphere. The same model is used for applications to atl véhicles. — . 111. System Function . As the engine vacuum increases, bubbles are formed at the end of the standpips due to the venting action.. The rising vapor bubbles vic— 2. lently agitate the fiuid and tend to increase vaporization. This vaporous—fiuid mixture enters the engine through the PCY system. IV. System Evaluation t. Clair Sales and Distributors, Inc. has submitted emission results of CVS tests performed by Scott Research Labbratory, The data sube mitted generally sfiow no adverse effect on emissions with this devifie when compared with the baselinge data. Based on the information presented and operating charactoristics of the system, no incompatibility exists with the accredited oxides of nitrogen retrofit devices.

St. Clair Sales and Disfributionfl Inc. January 22, 1974 {. Confirmatory testing was performed by the /\1'1; Resources Board ‘ Laboratbry. The device was tested on a 1973 Plymouth/Satellite ‘(360 CID) and 1974 Pontiac/Ventufa (250 C1ID). Stegdy state tests were performed on the Pontiac and Plymouth and a hot CVS was also conducted on the Plymouth. The steady state emission results of the Pontiac were generally lower than the baseline configuration. Steady state tests on the Plymouth also showed no significant change in emissions. The CVS test on the 1973 Plymouth showed a decrease %n carbon mbnoxide and essentially no change in hydrocarbqns and oxides of nitrogen emissions. The results of this test are listed below. 0 ' 1973 Federal Cycle Hot Start s 9. . Mass fEmissions (Grams/Hiles) Baseline 0.76 11.13 2.55 Lift—System | 0.78 . 6.21 2.67 These results were typical of the data submitted by the applicant. ¥.. < Conclusion and Recommendation The staff is of the opinion that the "Lift Fuel E?ficiency System" would not have any adverse effect on the existing poliution control system. .

~St. Clair Sales and Distribution, Inc. January 22, 1974 * Therefore, the staff recommends that the "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" be granted an exemption from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for 1974 and older vehicles.

Exnibit D State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD Jduly 3, 1974 Staff Report Addendum to the January 22, 1974 Staff Report "Evaluation of St. Clair Sales & Distribution Inc. ‘Lift Fuel Efficiency System‘ (Yapor Injector) for Exemptions from the Prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Motor Vehicle Code®" Introduction Tha Air Resources Board Laboratory has conducted further emission testing with the "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" to confirm previous test results. This vapor injector is manufactured by St. Clair — Sales & Distribution and utilizes a proprietary fiuid manufactured by Kem Crest Products Company of Farmington, Michigan. The additional tests were performed at the requests of the Sacramento District Attorney and Staff Counsel to investigate the effectiveness of the "Lift" device. St. Clair Sales & Distribution original application to the Air Resources Board for an éxémmtion to Vehicle Code Section 27156 was dated Hovember 28, 1973. An evaluation of the device showed that it would not have any adverse effect on émissiohs* and‘consequentTy, the Staff recommended in a staff report dated January 22, 1974, that an exemption be granted. Executive Order D—24 was issued on January 24, 1974 granting the exemption to Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code.

Exhibit D (Cont.) "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" July 3, 1974 On May 17, 7974{ Executive Order D—24—1 was issued revoking Executive Order D—24. The viclation of the conditions of the Executive Order led to the revocation. 11. System Description The "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" procurred commercially was found . _to be basically the same device evaluated by the ARB staff previously. ‘ The orifice diamater of the control valve is 0822 inches which is . identical to the device previously evaluated. The device was re— ceived with the proprietory fluid. Maximum air flow capacities of the present and original tested device are 0.050CFM and 0.080 CFM respectively. (See Figure 1 and Figure ?2). The difference is within manufacturing tolerances. II1. Emission Test Program The test program consisted af three pairs of back to back hot CVS—1 tests comparing the emissfons with and without the device. The three pair tests have been determined by the staff as being sufficient to determine whether the device would have a significant effect on the emission caontrol system. The vehicle selected had the following specifications: Make and Kodel Year: 1973 Ford Pinto Engine 2000 cc ho

Exhibit D (Cont.) "Lift Fuel Efficiency System" July 3. 1974 Carburetor Weber — 2 barrel « Transmission Automatic [ ' . Emission Control System Engine Modification inpammimenzome is \ After the vehicte was received by the ARB staff, the vehicle was pre—checked to assure all carburetor and fanition settings were adjusted to OEM. At the end of each test, the settings were $ N checked and adjusted. I¥. Emission Results and Evaluation The following tables summarizes the emission testing results of this progranm. Fus!? ¥ehicle Consumption mog 4 6/6/74 Baseling 1.28 14.25 20.78 — 678774 Lift oe r1.10 4 V o 6/6/74 Baseline 131 12.87) " s18/774 Lift 1.30 13.18 ié C 676774 BaseYine 135 13.98 1 678774 ¢ Llift 1.30 13.96 } Average Baseline 1.31 13.70 4 » Average "L{fE" 1.340013.82 Co

Exhibit D (Cont.) July 3, 1 7 w s The abovecemission data are typical for this type of vehicle. The slight change in emission and fuel economy with the device when come» pared to the baseline vehicle is not considered to be of any prectical Thess results were similar to previous tests. ¥. * Gased on all the available data, the Staff is of the opinfon that this dsvice would have no significant effects on exhaust emissions and fuel economy.

Exhibit D (Cont.) Figure 1 /0 Flow Rates of "Lift" device Evaluation Present Application 0.60 . ons aonevscuscraon ce + t xint t xii / ,s>* — * Fee t Per Minute) »** 0.50 ya** . &‘ y .*’I 7 e & «$y & mt c@ 1 0.30 . AIR FLOW P s 4 / _MMWM“LuwnumillimigAmm&%gnflmu*u#~u_u~mumw,w.,_w__” 0. 20 . 8.01 _ 8 12 16 20 Vacuum {Inches of Hg)

. Exhibft 5 (Cont.) Figure 2 Fiow of "Lift" Device Evaluation Previous Staff Report ——0.09; 0.08, AIB FLOW RATE (Cuble Fest Per Minute): 0.07. 0.06 _ 0. 65 0.04 _ 0.03 . 0.02 0.01 10 15 20 ¥acuum {Inches of Hg)

EXHLBLT A LIET, ING. 7818 SINTAVONI fi OJiE/A”G LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 P.G. BOX 5445 October 14, 1975 Mr. G. C. Hoff Chief of Vehicle Emission Control Air R@sources Board 9528 Telstar El Monte, CA 91731 Dear Mr. HoffS: Enclosed please find our application for exemption under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California, for vehicles of model year 1976, for your approval. As you know, the 1976 model cars are now being sold and your approval on our application for exemption is now being respec&— fully requested. . Looking forward to an eayrly reply, Iremain. Cordially, LIFT, INC. & M«éz William Hariton President ce: Richard Kefiny James Mikacich Willianm Simmons

mo: Mr. G. C. Hoff, Chief of Vehicle Emission Control Air Resources Board 9528 Telstar EI Monte, CA 91731 RE: APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION UNDER SECFION 27156 OF THE VEMICLE CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR VEHICLES OF MODEL YEAR 1976 We,— WILLIAM HARITON, individually and a President of LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, and LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, — do hereby, 4o# appl & # request, A # and 1 make application _p for exemption P from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code Sgcetion 27156 for the device commonly known as LIFT FPUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM, an intake manifold vapor bleed. It is hereby acknofiledged that the Air Resources Board has previously issued EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. D—24 on January 28, 1974, Executive Order KO. De24e1 on May 17, 1974, Executive Order NO. D~24—2 on July 12, 1974 and Executive Order NO,. D=24~3 on January 31, 1975; all of these Executive Orders relating to the devise commonly known as LIPT FUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM. Executive Order NO. De=24—3 of January 31, 1975 granted the exemp~— tion from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for > 1975 Model Year Véehicles and older. The purpose of this request and application is to continue this exemption for 1976 Model Year Vehicles and older. LIFT, INC., A California Corporation, has established its home cffice at 7819 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90046. Phone Number 213—656—2767. It is proceeding with its marketing and distribution of the LIPT FUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM throughout the State of California in conformity to and subject to all the ruiles, laws, reg— ulations of the State of California and subject to direct control of the policies and programs of the Air Resources Board of the Sgtate of Calif=~ ornia. There are presently no actions pending by any governmental aqency,'either federal, state or county against LIFPT, INC. All the requirements and mandates of the prior Executive Orders have been and are being abided by and conformed to. The basic description of the of the product still remains the same,. LIFT FUEL—EFPICIENCY SYSTEM is a compact unit which can be installed inside the engine compartment of any car or truck. The LIPT FUEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM is a vapor induction system. It has a .022 open/shut valve. & . ~l~ (Con‘t)

This set orifice controls the turbulation of the LIFT fuel and therefore, the vapor induced into the air—gasoline mixture for each combustion. The LIFT open/shut valve does not require adjusting. Basically, LIFT FUE EFFICIEN@Y SYSTEM is composed of a Plastic Fuel Reservoir—or container; Control Valve, Hose and Connecting device, which attaches to your carburetor‘s Pollution Control Valve {PVC). Within the reservoir is a proprietary blefld of chemicals that vaporize from a balanced formula, This vapor is drawn off the air space at the top of the reservoir. It then leads into the carburetor to blend with the gasoline‘s air mixture before it goes into the cylinders. This catalytic action extends the burning time of gasoline, giving you increased combustion efficiency. This application, in fact a re—application, is respectfully submitted for inmediate consideration. DATED: C..— TAM HARITON, Individually as President of LIFPT, INC., slifornia Corporation


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:45:09
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:45:09

Previous E.O. D-24-3 | Previous E.O. D-23 | Next E.O. D-24-5 | Next E.O. D-25