Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on September 5, 1995.
As of Monday, October 21st, 2024 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Part NumberModels
See PDFSee PDF

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. B-20-1
  • Executive Order 20-1 / D20-1
  • ARB # B-20-1
  • Executive Order No: B-20-1
  • C.A.R.B. No. B-20-1
  • Resolution B-20-1
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order B-20-1 PDF

B-20-1 Document:

CARB_B-20-1

(Page 1 of 3) state of California arm rssounces soano axzoverve onpan a—20—1 Relating to Rccreditation as an Bnfesston control Device Sold on a Non—Kandatory Basts weuznontos mwrenprzers, mnc. wtcro—comtrouten rexommex cormor, soren Whereas, section 43630 of the Nealth and Safety Code authorizes the Alr Resources Board (the *Board") to establish standards for accrediting devices which substantiaily reduce motor vahicle exhaust emission, and to accrodit davices which meet thase atandarda; whereas, in section 2010, Title 13, California Code of Regulations (*Con) and the incorporeted "california Bxbauet malasion Ceiteria and Tert rrocedures foe Rccediting Baiesion Control Devices Sold on an Non—Handatory Bases," the Roard has established such standards and tost procedures for deternining conpliance with then; whexeas, Nestronics Znterprises, Inc., of 11421 ®. Bernardo Cout, San biego, California 92127 has agplied for scceeditation of its Miero— controller feedback control system, pursuant to sestion 43630 and section 2010, mitre 13, com + whereas, purscant to the authority vested in the undarsigned by California Health and Safety Code Section 39516, the Mr Resources Board (ARB) finds: 1. the Miero—controiler feedback control. systen is a device desiqned to replace the original oxidation catalytic converter with a closed—loop three—uay catalytic converter. The vehicle‘s fusl mixture is nonitored and maintained clome to stoichfomatzie by leaning the fuel mixture when rich. The system consiste of a XAZ 200 computer manofactured by weutzonics, an oxygen senwor (P/N AFSITP for heated 02 and #/M 25105901 for unteated 02) manofactured by ho belco, a lineae actuated stepper notor valve (P/N ©92120) manfactured by Mr Packs, & wiring harnees and a theoe—way aftermacket catalytic convertes, with provistons for air for those vehtcles with ale infootion, (P/N 22100 and 29200 nee attachnent A for converter application) manifactured by Car sound. 2. The Micro—controtles feedback control systen satistios the test requirements and meats the standards estabiished for acoreditation by achloving at least a 20 percent reduction in enissions of bydeocarbonand oxides of nitzogen with no Inceesse in carbon nosowide. This finding is based on exhaust enteeton data derived from six test venicles. 3. the exhaost ensnion reductions discuased Sn the staff report rafiect the levels typical for the model, ago and mileage of the test vehicles. NoTE A eanple of six vehicles may not be adequate to repressnt the entaston reductions that could be achieved if the Micro—controlier feadback control. system is installed on a fleet of vehicles

wevzonzcs surenzazsss, me. suzcurave onnen m—20—1 wrero—coumzouser resounce contnot sretex (rage 2 of 3) 4. the appiicant subnitted durability data for Lts Moro— controiler feedback control. system. Durability‘and entston performance of the system at 20,000 mtlea were based on durability test data of a 1979 Cheveolet B1 Canino equipped with a 5.01 engine, a 1979 Volkswagen Seizocco equipped with a 1.6t angine and a 1975 Dateun 2710 equipped with a 2.0L angine. 5. The ARS in the exercise of technioal. dudgement consludes that the Mero—controller feedback control system will not cause substantial entssion reductions on lean=burn vehicles. im 18 onorrzp anp mesotVED: that Mestronicrs Enterprisas, Inc.‘s Mioro— controiler feedback control. system, consisting of a KP 200 conputer, a Car Sound aftermazket catalytic converter, an oxygen sensor, a wiring hazness and an air valve, is herepy sccredited as an entesfon—control device sold on « non—nandatory basis pursuant to section 43630 of the fealth and Safety Code, the Micro—controller feedback control system shall be applicable for gascline vehicien equigped with an opan—loop oxidation cataiytlo converter systen. Thix accreditation is mubjact to the following conditions 1. the following information shall be provided with the saie of each devices Instructions for maintaining the Mloro— controiler feedback control. system in proper working condition. Because no vehicle in the appiication class is coreantly covered by an enasion control system wassanty required to be provided by the vehicle nanifacture, the requirenent to provide notice that instailation of the device may invalidate the ventcle enisaion control. systen warvanty is waved. 2. This secreditation does not authorize the alteration or nodification of emiusion control devices required by law or regulstion, except what has been specified by the installation instructions. No changes to the tuning epecificatione is pernitted other than what the manufactures has specified in the inataliation instructions. 3. No changes are pernitted to the systom ss described in the staff report. Any changes to the systen applicable model yeaey or other factore addrensed in this mxecutive Order su ba evaluated and approved by the ARB prioe to maketing in caltfornia. 4. Hezketing of this system uning an identitication other that that ahown in this Executive Order or mazketing of this aystem for an appiication other than those isted in the Zxecutive Crder uhall be probibited unleas prics approval, is optained from the RRB. Accreditation of this product shall. not be construed as an acereditation to sell, orfer for male, or advertise any cononent of the Micro—controilee feedback control system an an individual device.

wsvznontcs surezentsss, tnc. sxsoureve oroen s—20—1 wrero—connorzen rasomncr coxsror svszex (Page 3 of 3) 5. nore: my granting the accreditation, the ARB has not deternined the potental entasion reduction levels that could be achieved fron the use of the XLoro—controller feedback contro system for the purpose of calculating eniesion credit« for any parpone. Use of the davice for enteston credite will require testing of a larger vehicle sanple size to deternine the entesion redustions representative of the vehicle fleet. Yislation of any of the above condittons shall be ground« for sevoention of this order. the order may be revoked only after ten day veitten notice of Intention to revoke the order, in which perfod the hoider of the order nay request in weiting a hearing to contest the proposed revoeation. If a mexting is requented, it mhall be held with ten days of receipt of the request and the order may not be revoked until a determination after nearing that grounds for revocntion exist. Exacutive Order No. B—20 dated September 19, 1991, is hereby superseded and of no further foree and affect. \ Executed at k1 monte, california, this <5 Uay of)Septembes 195. wobfe Source Division

~ momain a cammeztc comearen rase woimens Neutronice Enterprises, Inc. Micro—Controlier Retrofit Systen converter Serient ork configurstion custweight Engine Size msz00 undorbody** 24000 tbe. 24.00 Dual. Underbody 26.5t. use mesoo Undosboay® «4000 1me. «s.0n bus2. Undezbody «5000 the. <6.51. use * Individus1 part nunbers describe pipe dianatorn. ** Renove Oz precataiyst £€ any.


Document Created: 2015-08-28 15:31:50
Document Modified: 2015-08-28 15:31:50

Previous E.O. B-20 | Previous E.O. B-19 | Next E.O. B-20-2 | Next E.O. B-21