Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on January 25, 1989.
As of Saturday, October 19th, 2019 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Part NumberModels
5010EC-11026L1987-1988 Toyota Supra Turbo (7MG-TE) 3.0L, 183 CI

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-186
  • Executive Order 186 / D186
  • ARB # D-186
  • Executive Order No: D-186
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-186
  • Resolution D-186
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-186 PDF

D-186 Document:


(Page 1 of 2) State of California AIR RESOURCES 8OARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—186 Relating to Exemptions under Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code HKS USA INC. AIR—TO—AIR INTERCOOLER SYSTEM SERIES 5010EC Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Sections 39515 and 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—45—5; 1T IS ORDERED AND RESOLYVED: That the installation of the air—to—air intercooier system serles 5010EC manufactured by HKS USA, Inc. has been found not to reduce the effectiveness of required motor vehicle pollution control devices and, therafore, is exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for vehicle appllcat!ons Indicated in the exemption application. This exemption shall not apply to any device, apparatus, or mechanism advertised, offered for saie or sold with, or Instailed on, a motor vehiclie prior to or concurrent with transfer to an ultimate purchaser. This Executive Order is vaild provided that installation instructions for *h‘s device will not recommend tuning the vehicte_to speciflications different from those submitted by the devies manufacturer. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the device, as exempted by the Air Resources Board, that adversely affect the performance of a vehicle‘s poilution centrol system shall invalidate this Executive Or der . Marketing of this device using an Identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of this device for an application other than those [isted in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the Air Resources Board. .Exemption of a kit shall not be construed as an exemption to sell, offer for sale, or advertise any component of a kit as an individual device. This Executive Order does not constlitute any opinion as to the effect that the use of this device may have on any warranty either expressed or impiied by the vehicie manufacturer. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICAT!ION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES SCARD OF ANY CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF HKS USA, INC. AIR—TO—AIR INTERCOOLER SYSTEM.

HKS USA INC. — EXECUTIVE OoRrDER b—186 AIR~TO—AIR INTERCOOLER SYSTEM — (Page 2 of 2) SERIES §010EC No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by Alir Resources Board" may be made with respect to the action taken herein In any advertising or other oral or written communication. Section 17500 of the Business and Professions Code makes untrue or misleading advertising unlawful, and Section 17534 makes violation punishable as a misdemeanor. Section 43644 of the Health and Safety Code provides as follows: ~ "43644. (a) No person shall Install, sell, offer for sale, or advertise, or, except In an application to the state board for certification of a device, represent, any device as a motor vehicle poliution control device for use on any used motor vehicle unless that device has been certifled by the state board. No person shall sell, offer for sale, advertise, or represent any motor. vehlcie pollution control device as a certified device which, in fact, is not a certified device. Any violation of this subdivision is a misdemsanor." Any apparent violation of the conditions of this Executive Order will be submitted to the Attorney General of Callifornia for such action as he deems advisable. Executed at E1 Monte, callforn!a this day of January, 1989. /MM K. D. Drachand, Chief Mobile Source Division

State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD Evaluatlon of HKS USA, Inc.‘s Air—To—Air Intercooler System for Exemption from the Prohibitions of Vehicie Code Section 27156 in Accordance with Section 2222, Title 13, of the California Administrative Code. January 19, 1989

Evaluation of HKS USA, Inc.‘s Air—To—Air Intercooler System for Exemption from the Prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156 in Accordance with Section 2222, Title 13, of the California Administrative Code. by Mobile Source Division State of California Air Resources Board 9528 Telstar Avenue E1 Monte, CA 91731 (This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily—reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use).

SUMMARY HKS USA, Inc. (HKS) has requested an exemption from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156 for their air—to—air intercooler system for use on the OEM turbocharged vehicles listed in the appendix. Based on previous comparative tests evaluating the exhaust emission effects of several add—on intercooler kits and the staff‘s engineering evaluation of the intercooler‘s impact on exhaust emisslons from turbocharged vehicles, the staff concludes that the HKS‘s air—to—air intercooler kit wilt not adversely affect exhaust emisslons from vehicles for which exemption is requested. The staff recommends that HKS USA, Inc. be granted an exemption for their air—to—air Intercooler system as requested and that Executive Order D—186 be Issued.

CONTENTS SUMMARY CONTENTS I. INTROD T1 N 11. NCL | N 111. RECOMMENDATION IV. INTER R YSTEM DESCRIPTION AND OPERAT1ON v. 1 1 N Vi. APPEND 1X List of Vehicle Applications

Evaluation of HKS USA, Inc.‘s Air—To—Air Intercooler System for Exemption from the Prohibltlons of Vehicle Code Section 27156 in Accordance with Section 2222, Title 13, of the California Adminlistrative Code. 1. | T ILON HKS USA, Inc., of 20312 G@ramercy Place, Torrance, California 90501, has requested an exemption from the prohibitions of Vehicle Code Section 27156 for their air—to—air intercooler system for use on the OEM turbocharged vehicle [isted in the appendix. 11. N L QN Based on previous comparative tests evaluating the exhaust emission effects of different add—on intercooler kits and the staff‘s engineering evaluation of the intercooler‘s impact on exhaust emisslons from turbocharged vehicles, the staff concludes that HKS‘s air—to—air intercooler system will not adversely affect exhaust emissions from vehicles for which exemption is requested. III. RE MENDAT 1 The staff recommends that HKS USA, Inc. be granted an exemption for their air—to—air intercooler system as requested and that Executive Order D—186 be issued.

LV . 1 R LER SYSTEM DESCR! ION AND OPERATION The purpose of the intercooler is to reduce the temperature of the Iintake air/fue! charge going into the turbocharged engine. This reductlon in the intake charge temperature allows a higher charge density (more amount of air per minute flowing through the engine) which means more fuel! into the engine at a glven intake manifold vacuum/pressure. The major components of the HKS air—to—air intercooler system are: aluminum heat exchanger, pressure pipes, cadmium plated brackets, sillcone connector hoses, hose clamps, compressor by— pass valve, silicone vacuum and blow—by hoses. They are packaged with installation hardware and instructions and sold as a kit. The system Is designed using different design concepts, including tubing lengths, diameter and bends, to sult the requirements of the individual vehlcle. The HKS air—to—air Intercooler system heat exchanger is mounted In the vehicies‘ frontal air. stream. The intercooler is spliced Into the original intake air plumbing between the turbocharger compressor and the intake manifold throttle body. During boost conditions, compressed air, normally 230 degrees F, is cooled to 130 degrees F by the HKS Intercooler core being delivered to the engine . Some HKS intercooler systems incorporate a compressor by—pass valve which routes compressor discharge directly into the compressor intake under deceleration. This arrangement prevents impeller deceleration between gear shifts and reduces shock waves in intercooler plumbing and core. ‘

v. D | | HKS air—to—air intercooler system is similar in design concepts and principles as other manufacturers‘ systems that have been exempted by the Air Resources Board. Performance analyses that were previously submitted to the ARB by other manufacturers of similar system indicated that typlcal thermal efficiency of a turbocharger intercooler system ranges between 40% and 84%. Based on predicted efficiency of a heat exchanger on previous air temperature measurements of other exempted intercoolers installed and tested on vehicles and on a review of the device theory of operation, the staff has concluded that the use of an intercooler would not adversely affect vehicle emlissions or result in the degrading of a vehicle‘s driveabillty. In addition, 1t is the staff‘s opinion that the combustion temperature wlll be reduced as a result of cooler intake charge with the use of the air—to—air intercooler system. This reduction in combustion temperature will reduce the formation of NOX gases in the combustion chamber, resulting in less NOX emissions expelled through the exhaust system. HKS air—to—air intercooler system has similar design with Spearco alr—to—alr intercooler system which is exempted by the ARB under E.0. D—140—3. Spearco‘s previous test results demonstrate no adverse effect on the vehicle‘s exhaust emissions of their kit.

APPEND I X

7. List vehicle makes, model years, engine displacements and systems that are compatible with the device, and for which exemption is requested. Specify the correct device model for each vehicle. — HKS Part No. Model—Years Make Model/Engine Oisp. (1.G1) 5Q10EC—11026L 1987—1988 Toyota Supra Turto (TMG—TE) 3.0,183 S@10EC—12721J 1985—1987 Toyota 4WD0 PU Turbo (Z2R—TE) 2.4,144 SG10EC—12821J 1985—1987 Toyota 4 Runner Turbo (Z22R—TE) 2.4.144 50i0EC-12221J 1985—1987 Toyota 2WD PU }urbo (22R—TE} 2.4,.144 SQ10EC—24046H 1984—1986 Nissan 3002X Turbo (VG30ET) 3.0.181 SGi0EC—24046L 1987 Nissan 30072X Turbo (VG30ET) 3.0.181 SGI@EC—%4¢47H 1984—1986 Nissan 2005X Turbo (CAIBET) 1.8,110 0‘ 5010EC—24243E 1981—1983 Nissan 2802X Turbo (L28ET} 2.8. 168 SQ10EC—470706 1983 Mitsub Starion Turbo (G54BT) 2.6,156 SQ10EC—47070H 1984—1987 Mitsub Starion ES/LE (B5487) .6 , 156 bu S010EC—47070H 1984—1987 Dodge/ Conquest Turbo (6§4BT} 7.6, 156 Plymth/ Chrysier SQi0EC—47171J 1985— 1986 Mitsub Mirage Turbo (G3281) 1.6, 98 SQ10EC—47171J 1985—1986 Dodge/ Colt Turbe (§32BT) 1.6, 98 Plymth SQ18EC—4717IL 1987—1988 Mitsub Mirage Turbo (§32B1) 1.6, 38 SQ10EC—47171L 1887—1988 Dodge/ Colt Turbo (632B1) 1.6, 98 Plymth 5C10EC—58383K 1986—1987 Mazda 626 67 Turbo (FE Turbo} > 2.0, 122


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:45:54
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:45:54

| Previous E.O. D-185 | Next E.O. D-186-1 | Next E.O. D-187