Approval Details

Valid E.O.

Validity

This Executive Order approved the specified parts on on January 29, 1998.
As of Monday, January 20th, 2025 this Executive Order has not been overturned or superceeded.

Approved Parts

Part NumberModelsModification
87713, 887131996-1998 Ford 4.6L V-8 2-valve Mustang GTIt is applicable only to those vehicles that have been certified to meet the California Tier-1 exhaust emission standards. It excludes those vehicles that have been certified to meet low-emission vehicle emission standards.

This Executive Order may be listed as:
  • C.A.R.B.E.O. D-182-24
  • Executive Order 182-24 / D182-24
  • ARB # D-182-24
  • Executive Order No: D-182-24
  • C.A.R.B. No. D-182-24
  • Resolution D-182-24
For Free CARB Executive Order Status verification, email an image of the device Executive Order label as well as the Year/Make/Model and Test Group # of the vehicle to [email protected]

Download: Executive Order D-182-24 PDF

D-182-24 Document:

CARB_D-182-24

_ (Page 1 of 2) State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER D—182—24 Relating to Exemptions Under Section 27156 — of the Vehicle Code WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY TUBULAR EXHAUST HEADERS Pursuant to the authority vested in the Air Resources Board (ARB) by Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code; and > ‘ Pursuant to the authority vested in the undersigned by Sections 39515 and 39516 of the Health and Safety Code and Executive Order G—45—9; IT IS ORDERED AND RESOLVED: That installation of the Tubular Exhaust Headers, manufactured by Walker Manufacturing Company of 2701 N. Dettman Road, Jackson, Michigan 49201, have been found not to reduce the effectiveness of the applicable vehicle pollution control system, and therefore, the Tubular Exhaust Headers, listed below, are exempt from the prohibitions of Section 27156 of the Vehicle Code for use on the following vehicles: Part Number Vehicle Application Ceramic Paint 87713 88713 1996—1998 Ford 4.6 L V—8 2—valve Mustang GT The above vehicle application includes only those vehicles that have been certified to meet the California Tier—1 exhaust emission standards. It excludes those vehicles that have beer certified to meet low—emission vehicle emission standards, e.g. TLEV, LEV, etc. This Executive Order is valid provided that installation instructions for the headers not recommend. tuning the vehicles to specifications different from those submitted by the vehicle manufacturer. Changes made to the design or operating conditions of the headers, as exempt by the ARB, which may adversely affect the performance of the vehicles‘ pollution control system shall invalidate this Executive Order. ‘

WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY EXECUTIVE ORDER D—182—24 TUBULAR EXHAUST HEADERS (Page 2 of 2) mm Marketing of the headers using an identification other than that shown in this Executive Order or marketing of the headers for an application other than those listed in this Executive Order shall be prohibited unless prior approval is obtained from the ARB. Exemption of the headers shall not be construed as an exemption to sell, offer for sale, or advertise any components of the headers as individual devices. This Executive Order does not constitute any opinion as to the effect the use of the headers may have on any warranty either expressed or implied by the vehicle manufacturer. No claim of any kind, such as "Approved by the Air Resources Board," may be made with respect to the action taken herein in any advertising or other oral or written communication. THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CERTIFICATION, ACCREDITATION, APPROVAL, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENDORSEMENT BY THE AIR RESOURCES BOARD OF CLAIMS OF THE APPLICANT CONCERNING ANTI—POLLUTION BENEFITS OR ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS OF WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY‘S TUBULAR EXHAUST HEADERS. Violation of any of the above conditions shall be grounds for revocation of this Executive Order. The Executive Order may be revoked only after a ten—day written notice of intention to revoke the Executive Order, in which period the holder of the Executive Order mayrequest in writing a hearing to contest the proposed revocation. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held within ten days of receipt of the request and the Executive Order may not be revoked until a determination after the hearing that grounds for revocation exist. Executed at El Monte, California, this 2 ‘i day of January 1998. R. B. Summerfield," Chief Mobile Source Operations Division


Document Created: 2005-09-01 12:44:21
Document Modified: 2005-09-01 12:44:21

Previous E.O. D-182-23 | Previous E.O. D-181 | Next E.O. D-182-25 | Next E.O. D-183